The Forged Signature At The Bottom Of Your Inheritance
In J&K, land is identity, security, and memory. Someone in the revenue department knows exactly what that makes it worth
A tehsildar does not process mutations. In J&K's paper-dependent revenue architecture, he is the record. His signature becomes ownership. His forgery becomes your eviction notice. Crime Branch raids across Srinagar and Budgam confirm what every landowner already knew: the mutation register is not the law. It is a commodity. Tehsildar Nusrat Aziz allegedly ran a criminal enterprise from inside state authority, forged transfers,
fabricated ownership chains, and destroyed originals, targeting land where Srinagar's urbanisation converts acres into crores. The prime accused remains at large. This silence screams. But arrests solve nothing structural. Tehsildars wield unilateral mutation power without digital audit trails, independent verification, or whistle-blower protection. This is not staffing failure. This is an institutional design that accommodates corruption. Small farmers don't lose land to forgery
alone. They lose it to a system that made forgery possible, reversal glacial, and survival catastrophic. When will J&K digitise revenue records completely? When will AI audit mutation entries in real-time? When will third-party verification become mandatory? When will tehsildars lose unchecked power over the territory's lifeblood? Raids were necessary. Overhaul is overdue. Land is J&K's oxygen. The state has left it unguarded.
Leave a comment