Of 697 lakes recorded in 1967, 315 have disappeared. At this trajectory, the next generation inherits a map without water
The Comptroller and Auditor General have delivered a verdict that no press release can soften. In fifty years, Jammu and Kashmir has lost 315 lakes entirely over 1,500 hectares of freshwater ecosystem erased without a single comprehensive conservation plan covering the vast majority. Another 203 lakes are shrinking. Sixty-three have lost more than half their original area and are approaching extinction. The audit period covers 2017-22, but the pattern it documents spans generations. The structural diagnosis is precise. Lakes fall under multiple jurisdictions revenue, forest, agriculture, district administrations with no unified oversight framework binding them. Conservation efforts were concentrated on just six waterbodies. The remaining hundreds received neither monitoring nor funding nor planning attention. Project this trajectory forward ten years: without systemic intervention, J&K risks losing its remaining ecologically fragile lakes to encroachment, agricultural runoff, sewage infiltration, and administrative indifference. Dal Lake's documented land-use pressures, Wular's absent oversight mechanism, Hokersar's 2,500 kanal of affected land these are not isolated failures. They are symptoms of a fractured governance architecture. The State administration must demonstrate institutional seriousness on environmental governance, which must now extend beyond six priority lakes to a statutory, unified conservation authority with binding inter-departmental jurisdiction, mandatory monitoring, and legislated timelines. Water is not infrastructure. It is inheritance. And J&K is spending it without accounting for the debt.
Leave a comment